The presence of the Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus tick in the Ricaurte Province of the department of Boyacá is recent and has been the cause of improper use and without technical criteria of the chemicals recommended for its control. This research aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the acaricides Cipermetrin (15%, 225ppm), Amitraz (20.8%, 312ppm) and Triclorfon (97% 1500ppm) and to determine the best control alternative in the area. For the study, wild ticks from bovine cattle (Bos taurus) naturally infested on Gachantivá and Arcabuco farms were manually collected and taken for research purposes to the Animal Parasitology laboratory of the Pedagogical and Technological University of Colombia (Uptc) located in the city of Tunja, Boyacá. Based on the immersion techniques proposed by Drumond (1973), the Mortality Efficacy and Reproduction Control of each treatment were determined starting from the Thursfield formules (1997), the values were analyzed by variance analysis and compared to each other by Tukey's test (p<0.05). Results of Efficiency and Reproduction Control (100% and 99%) for Triclorfon, (66.7% and 97%) for Amitraz (41.8% and 23%) for Cypermethrin showed that the use of acaricides based in Cypermethrin baths offered low levels of control, and the baths of Amitraz and Triclorfon can be considered as an alternative to chemical control of ticks in the area.